On Privacy

When people argue against privacy rights by saying that they have “nothing to hide”, it’s probably true. Their lives just aren’t important enough to warrant a need for privacy. Privacy is about concealing something, or more accurately, the right to keep something from being observed by others. It’s not about keeping something secret, it’s about freedom from other people having access to it. In this way privacy is not a positive–an action taken to conceal–but a negative–a denial of access.

But privacy only really matters when the thing in question has any value. People don’t care about the state listening to their phone calls or reading their email because those things just don’t have much value, neither to them, nor to the state. There is no point arguing with such people on privacy rights because they themselves don’t actually need it–and that’s not because they undervalue privacy, it’s because they don’t value anything of theirs highly enough to warrant it.

Share on Twitter Facebook Email

“For even falsehood, uttered by the tongue of man, seemed like truth and light before this hopelessly-deaf and unresponsive silence.”

My new book: a translation of selected short stories by Leonid Andreyev, the father of Russian Expressionism from the Silver Age of Russian literature. A piercing, pitiless glance into the heart of the human condition.

☛ Read online

Further Reading

Proust wrote that the true voyage of discovery is not to visit strange lands, but to possess other eyes, to behold a hundred universes that each of them beholds. Thus, in the words of Ruskin, what good books give us is not mere knowledge, but sight.

Sign up to my email newsletter to receive regular recommendations of exceptional books on a wide range of topics including design, art, history and philosophy. A summary of latest site updates will also be included. Sign up below: